23/01/2013 09:58 | By Chris Rees

Should 16-year olds be allowed to drive?

We explore the 'for' and 'against' arguments around drivers taking to the roads at 16.


16-year-old drivers - for and against (© Renault)


A new law has just come into effect allowing 16-year-olds to drive quadricycles. The new European ‘AM’ category is for ultra-lightweight cars (less than 350kg) with a top speed limited to 28mph.

Cars you can drive at 16
The cheapest cars to insure for 17-18 year-olds
 

The case for 16-year-old drivers

By Chris Rees, MSN Cars contributor:

“I’ve got three kids. My daughter has passed her driving test, but my twin boys have yet to pass theirs. So am I in favour of 16-year-olds being able to drive? Absolutely.

“Let’s be clear here – we’re not talking about kids being let loose on powerful cars. The new law is about 16-year-old adults gaining the right to drive a special class of car that’s limited to a top speed of 28mph.

“This new class of car may be new to the UK, but it’s been around in other EU countries for decades. In fact, in France and Italy they allow drivers as young as 14 to get behind the wheel of cars like this, and we don’t see a huge debate about this over there.

“Of course, 16-year-olds do already drive on our roads. Sadly, thus far they’ve been restricted to extremely dangerous mopeds – almost certainly the main reason why statistics show a sudden spike in deaths among 16-year-old males.

I’d far rather have my children drive one of these quadricycles than a moped

“I’d far rather have my children drive one of these quadricycles than a moped – they’re clearly much safer. Four wheels are just much more stable than two, and the Renault Twizy, for instance, comes with a full roll-over cage and an airbag as standard.

“Are 16-year-old drivers of low-powered cars really going to present more dangers than 16-year old motorcyclists? I doubt it.

“Are 16-year-olds reckless yobbos intent on demonising our roads? Of course not.

“There are lots of positive reasons to celebrate the fact that 16-year-olds can now drive quadricycles. Some young people are forced give up further education because they don’t have access to transport; others are prevented from taking jobs for the same reason. This new class of cars could be a real lifeline.

“I like the idea of my kids being more independent – and selfishly speaking, I quite like the idea of not having to ferry them around, too.

“If we want our young adults – and remember, 16-year-olds are adults – to learn useful skills in life, there’s a real opportunity here to let them learn roadcraft at an earlier age, getting them used to roads and other traffic in a low-powered vehicle before they progress to a full-size car at 17.

“Yes, that 28mph speed limit might cause problems for other drivers on country roads, but these cars are really designed for urban environments where you’d be lucky to reach 28mph.

“In any case, I very much doubt that our roads are about to be infested with 16-year-olds driving quadricycles. The price of buying one (around £10,000 for an Aixam) and the cost of insurance (typically around £2,200 for a 16-year-old, according to insurance broker Bikesure) will always keep this type of motoring for a minority.

“And they’ll only be on the road for a year at most, when they’ll doubtless switch to a full-size car – as safer and more mature drivers.”

16-year-old drivers - for and against (© Axaim)

 

The case against 16-year-old drivers

By Neil Greig, director of policy & research at the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM):

“I have some serious concerns about this new development, which has seemingly come from nowhere.

“Research shows that young men at 16 are inherently dangerous. They don’t know enough about road safety. I don’t think that the argument about gaining roadcraft experience holds, because 16-year olds are less open to learning, and there’s no requirement for any other adult or instructor to be in the vehicle.

“The 16-year-old will be required to take a CBT test before being allowed to drive, but the IAM has concerns about the CBT test. The course is only half a day and is meant as an introduction only. At present there is no requirement for further training, and the fear is that after a half a day, 16-year-olds will be driving solo with no extra training, never having had to pass a proper test.

Why are we allowing these vehicles on our roads now, when we have such good road safety

 “There’s a risk with drivers with so little experience being on the roads. The IAM definitely recommends going beyond CBT, but as far as I’m aware, no courses exist to learn about driving quadricycles. The IAM does offer a moped course, but it has very little take-up.

“Yes, these quadricycles are marginally safer than mopeds but they’re not built to the same safety standards as cars. There’s an argument that these vehicles simply provide a bigger vehicle for youngsters to misbehave and make mistakes in.

“And while they’re limited to a top speed of 28mph, will youngsters find a way of tampering with the mechanicals to obtain more performance – as they often do with mopeds?

“We have no experience of these cars in the UK, and the low speeds these cars run at could cause issues for other drivers.

“I’m also concerned that quadricycles can also carry passengers, and there’s strong evidence to show that the more young people you have in a car, the greater the danger. It’s a recipe for disaster.

“Why are we allowing these vehicles on our roads now, when we have such good road safety?

“My advice to parents would be to wait until their children are 17, when they’re old enough to drive a full-size car.”
 

Vote now
An error occurred while trying to display the data. Please try again later.

Should 16-year olds be allowed to drive?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1.  
    39 %
    Yes
    994 votes
  2.  
    61 %
    No
    1,572 votes

Total Responses: 2,566
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.


Cars you can drive at 16
The cheapest cars to insure for 17-18 year-olds
 

136Comments
23/01/2013 15:00
avatar
"and remember, 16-year-olds are adults" Are they f*ck. They're still mummy-dependent children fresh out of high school. You're not an adult until you're capable of looking after yourself. Mummy and daddy buying you a car because you're a rich t*sser who doesn't yet know the value of money doesn't constitute as being "adult"
23/01/2013 15:40
avatar
and for the record Mr Rees, at 16 you are not an adult. At 18 you become an adult in the UK, which is why you are able to vote. You people need to learn the facts before writing things. The age for drivers in the UK should be put up to 21 not lowered to 16.
23/01/2013 14:59
avatar
Since when have 16 year olds been adults Chris Rees?
23/01/2013 15:33
avatar
Hell no! If anything the age should be raised to 21.
23/01/2013 15:17
avatar

NO NO NO Absoluetly NOT

 

Most kids at the age of 17 are not sensible, why the hell dya think their insurance is so high.

 

Statistics speak for themselves.

And these damn things are death traps, causing impatience in other drivers leading to more accidents..

 

 

NO

23/01/2013 15:45
avatar
pfft, 16 year olds driving is a terrible idea. I passed my test a few months ago being 18 and I dont think I was even ready for the roads! I think this will just promote even more drink and drug driving!
23/01/2013 15:21
avatar
16 year olds drive, you must be havin a laugh, they don't even respect their elders, let alone other road users, the some of the ones that are already on mopeds have not got the sense they were born with. Yet, there are some who have been driving for years, and still don't know how it should be done with manners and/or courtesy in or on whatever they may be driving/riding.
23/01/2013 15:20
avatar
They cant even ride those ear splitting/deafening Scooters that sound like a wasp in a bottle responsibly on the road..............anyway that thing in the top picture looks like a shopmobility scooter,not cool for 16 yr olds.
23/01/2013 15:44
avatar

18 minimum age and probationary period for 5 years with a two strikes eg speeding, using mobile phone, etc and you resit the entire test.

23/01/2013 15:16
avatar

No, wait until they are an adult and CAN AFFORD A BLOODY CAR!

 

Ridiculous, they should be riding cycles and getting public transport. Driving would only heap more pressure on them. Being 25 I have a fair say on this!

 

They should have the rules of the road drilled into them though, society is bad enough at driving as it is.

 

IAM asked me to be an observer for the company... so I've seen some HORRENDOUS mistakes on the roads. And to be honest, MANY weren't young. So the education of 16 year olds about the rules of the road should be drilled into them so they don't make the mistakes of others!

23/01/2013 16:08
avatar
and whos supposed to pay for this?? a 16 year old is never gonna be able to afford the 2 grand insurance let alone the 10grand for the ugly thing itself, and with prices going up for everything else i don't think many parents are going to be able to afford it for them. and most 17 year olds are bad enough as it is (boys and girls, cause girls are just as bad as boys) so how is someone still at school or just left school gonna be any better??
23/01/2013 17:22
avatar
the only thing a  16 year old is capable of driving is their parents up the wall
23/01/2013 15:25
avatar
Everyone should have passed a test on a moped before they are allowed near four wheels. A bit of experience not being cocooned in a tin box is essential training for everyone. Concessions of course for the genuinely disabled who should be permitted to drive a quadricycle.

As for real cars there need to be srtict size and power restrictions for learner car drivers, similar to those on motorcyclists. Lets say 999cc and 50kW up to 21 for test 1 then 1499cc and 75kW for test one if over 21. Test 2 for a vehicle 100kW  and 1500cc to 2499cc  then test 3 and over 29 for anything bigger. Reckon that will cut much of the mayhem on the road.

23/01/2013 17:03
avatar

Personally I think this is a con by car manufacturers and the DVLA, how much will these cars cost?  A parent will be expected to buy one for one year then buy a "proper car" a year later.

 

The DVLA will no doubt introduce a two tier test which will cost more in the long run.

 

28mph may sound great on paper but in rural parts of the world this doubles your journey times.  If you think driving behind a tractor is bad imagine one of these for an hour to cover the 30 miles into work!

 

I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of 16 year olds driving, every teenager is different.  I was too mature for my own good, many aren't.  Many drivers in their 50s and 60s are as rude and dangerous as any 16 year old.  However I think this proposal is driven by pure greed.

23/01/2013 15:47
avatar
Isn't it about time we had a transport minister with balls. We should raise the driving age to 21 and have a maximum age limit of 75. We should also start imposing lifetime bans for drunk and dangerous drivers and like lorry drivers, people should have to sit in front of a comittee and plead their case to get their licence back rather than have it sent automatically in the post at the end of the ban. And our driving test should be a lot more difficult (practical) and a course in basic car maintenance should also be required. Anyone agree?
23/01/2013 16:41
avatar

Using a Quadricycle on a CBT........ Its a fecking car for godsake, just a rather lightweight one.

If they want to drive it they SHOULD pass the proper driving licence test which is a theory test, hazard perception followed by the 45minute practical.

Then it also should be made law to wear the Green 'P' plate, just like the red 'L' plate for motorbike under a 125cc.

 

Being limited to 28mph, I'm betting you after a while they will have it "derestricted", just to get that extra 1bhp and 4mph.

23/01/2013 16:11
avatar
When mopeds leave the factory, they are restricted to 30mph but in my line of business I see so many 16 year olds and their parents who want me to derestrict them so that they can reach speeds of up to 60mph. Firstly this is highly illegal and also irresponsible on the parents behalf but would these same parents now be trying to get these quadricycles to do the same sort of speeds? I am sure there will people who say that it is impossible to do but there is normally a way that this can be achieved.
23/01/2013 16:17
avatar
They should bring in a law which says people between the age of 16-25 can only drive a car with a certain size engine like they have with motorbikes. By the time they are 25 they will have had plenty of road sense/experience to go out and buy a car with a bigger engine.

My little cousin is 18 he drives a 1.2 Corsa and he drives like a nutter! I DO NOT feel safe being in the car with him and he now wants a new car with more power!  


23/01/2013 15:39
avatar
The main reason that 16 year olds are allowed to drive is that they keep the insuarance companies going as they charge not just an arm and a leg to insure them but both arms, legs and possibly even the head thrown in for good measure. Without 16 year olds to fleece the insurance companies would have to pass that onto everyone else.
avatar

The Law will still require a 16-year-old to qualify for a Moped Rider licence, so the applicant will still be obliged to acquire the necessary roadcraft skills.  You can't "fall off" four wheels so there is that  improvement over a moped for worried parents.  My GP refers to all 2-wheeled riders as "Organ Donors". 

 

Ideally all schoolchildren should receive some kind of instruction in the Highway Code etc., as part of the normal school curriculum. 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Latest Cars videos

Get the Bing Weather App for Windows 8 (© Microsoft)

More on msn Cars

Should 16-year olds be allowed to drive?We explore the 'for' and 'against' arguments around drivers taking to the roads at 16.Chris Rees2013-01-23T09:58:04 A new law has just come into effect allowing 16-year-olds to drive quadricycles. The new European ‘AM’ category is for ultra-lightweight cars (less than 350kg) with a top speed limited to 28mph.Cars you can drive at 16The cheapest cars to insure for 17-18 year-olds   The case for 16-year-old driversBy Chris Rees, MSN Cars contributor:“I’ve got three kids. My daughter has passed her driving test, but my twin boys have yet to pass theirs. So am I in favour of 16-year-olds being able to drive? Absolutely.“Let’s be clear here – we’re not talking about kids being let loose on powerful cars. The new law is about 16-year-old adults gaining the right to drive a special class of car that’s limited to a top speed of 28mph.“This new class of car may be new to the UK, but it’s been around in other EU countries for decades. In fact, in France and Italy they allow drivers as young as 14 to get behind the wheel of cars like this, and we don’t see a huge debate about this over there.“Of course, 16-year-olds do already drive on our roads. Sadly, thus far they’ve been restricted to extremely dangerous mopeds – almost certainly the main reason why statistics show a sudden spike in deaths among 16-year-old males. I’d far rather have my children drive one of these quadricycles than a moped“I’d far rather have my children drive one of these quadricycles than a moped – they’re clearly much safer. Four wheels are just much more stable than two, and the Renault Twizy, for instance, comes with a full roll-over cage and an airbag as standard.“Are 16-year-old drivers of low-powered cars really going to present more dangers than 16-year old motorcyclists? I doubt it.“Are 16-year-olds reckless yobbos intent on demonising our roads? Of course not.“There are lots of positive reasons to celebrate the fact that 16-year-olds can now drive quadricycles. Some young people are forced give up further education because they don’t have access to transport; others are prevented from taking jobs for the same reason. This new class of cars could be a real lifeline.“I like the idea of my kids being more independent – and selfishly speaking, I quite like the idea of not having to ferry them around, too.“If we want our young adults – and remember, 16-year-olds are adults – to learn useful skills in life, there’s a real opportunity here to let them learn roadcraft at an earlier age, getting them used to roads and other traffic in a low-powered vehicle before they progress to a full-size car at 17.“Yes, that 28mph speed limit might cause problems for other drivers on country roads, but these cars are really designed for urban environments where you’d be lucky to reach 28mph.“In any case, I very much doubt that our roads are about to be infested with 16-year-olds driving quadricycles. The price of buying one (around £10,000 for an Aixam) and the cost of insurance (typically around £2,200 for a 16-year-old, according to insurance broker Bikesure) will always keep this type of motoring for a minority.“And they’ll only be on the road for a year at most, when they’ll doubtless switch to a full-size car – as safer and more mature drivers.”    The case against 16-year-old driversBy Neil Greig, director of policy & research at the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM):“I have some serious concerns about this new development, which has seemingly come from nowhere.“Research shows that young men at 16 are inherently dangerous. They don’t know enough about road safety. I don’t think that the argument about gaining roadcraft experience holds, because 16-year olds are less open to learning, and there’s no requirement for any other adult or instructor to be in the vehicle.“The 16-year-old will be required to take a CBT test before being allowed to drive, but the IAM has concerns about the CBT test. The course is only half a day and is meant as an introduction only. At present there is no requirement for further training, and the fear is that after a half a day, 16-year-olds will be driving solo with no extra training, never having had to pass a proper test. Why are we allowing these vehicles on our roads now, when we have such good road safety “There’s a risk with drivers with so little experience being on the roads. The IAM definitely recommends going beyond CBT, but as far as I’m aware, no courses exist to learn about driving quadricycles. The IAM does offer a moped course, but it has very little take-up.“Yes, these quadricycles are marginally safer than mopeds but they’re not built to the same safety standards as cars. There’s an argument that these vehicles simply provide a bigger vehicle for youngsters to misbehave and make mistakes in.“And while they’re limited to a top speed of 28mph, will youngsters find a way of tampering with the mechanicals to obtain more performance – as they often do with mopeds?“We have no experience of these cars in the UK, and the low speeds these cars run at could cause issues for other drivers.“I’m also concerned that quadricycles can also carry passengers, and there’s strong evidence to show that the more young people you have in a car, the greater the danger. It’s a recipe for disaster.“Why are we allowing these vehicles on our roads now, when we have such good road safety?“My advice to parents would be to wait until their children are 17, when they’re old enough to drive a full-size car.”  Cars you can drive at 16The cheapest cars to insure for 17-18 year-olds   99a60d2b-dfb0-4520-a78b-6ae7354f5867DisableCenterPollsVote now16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Renault)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)16-year-old drivers - for and against (Axaim)