28/04/2012 13:47 | By Richard Aucock, contributor, MSN Cars
Real-world mpg: the biggest car fuel economy losers

The one improvement... Mercedes-Benz S 350 L CDI Bluetec



The one improvement... Mercedes-Benz S 350 L CDI Bluetec (© Mercedes-Benz)
Next
Previous
Previous
  • The one improvement... Mercedes-Benz S 350 L CDI Bluetec (© Mercedes-Benz)
Next
Mercedes-BenzShow Thumbnails
Previous22 of 22Next
Share this Gallery

The one improvement... Official mpg: 36.7 Actual mpg: 37.3 Gap: +1.6%
Remarkably, the only car to score fuel economy better than the quoted figures is the mighty Mercedes S 350 L CDI Bluetec. Anyone who says big cars are gas guzzlers is wrong: this car actually performs BETTER even the government economy figures!

First drive: Mercedes-Benz S-Class

Car fuel economy - the truth about MPG

107Comments
27/04/2012 19:48
avatar
The fact that the government/manufacturers fuel consumption figures are in LaLa land has been well known for a long time. Even a blind man can see that testing something in a controlled environment in a lab will have no connection to driving the cars in the real world. What makes it worse is that the government is behind it so you cannot sue the car manufacturer for misrepresentation because they just quote the governments stance.

The quoted figures take no account of the fact that you constantly have to brake and then accelerate when driving, there may be cross winds or head winds when cruising so there is no way you can reach the cruising mpg figures quoted. Having your head lights on can dramatically affect fuel consumption because of the extra drag on the engine caused by the alternator, like wise, air conditioning. Then there is the usual rush hour traffic jams where you may not get out of 1st or 2 nd gear for most of your journey. You may have passengers on board or be carrying other heavy things which all cause extra drag, which also applies if you fill your car up as a full tank of fuel is very heavy. 

If you drive a turbo diesel and use the boost all the time, which you will be, you will be quite surprised by how much fuel you can use - this is why many small turbo diesels are way below what is quoted. There are many other things which the  lab does not take into consideration, so be advised,never buy a car based on the quoted fuel consumption figures and, by the look of this test, be very careful when purchasing a petrol/diesel hybrid as well, because they only work if you do a few miles a day and can stay on electric power only, as soon as the petrol/diesel engine is used, the fuel consumption is not better than a non- hybrid vehicle and in some cases its a lot worse. Given that you have just paid a lot more money for the hybrid version than the equivalent petrol/diesel power one,  you could be well out of pocket.



28/04/2012 12:06
avatar
A friend of mine bought a new Toyota IQ  over a year ago.  It was getting 36 mpg.
The garage gave all the excuses  , running in, after 200 miles will give better consumption, etc.
A year later and he still getting around 36 mpg.

Really all owners should take a class action in the Courts against  each  Manufacturer for  miss leading  selling  by fraud and misrepresentation  and demand damages . If that happened then you would find very quickly the Manufacturers would tell the trurth , and stop this missleading advertising.

28/04/2012 14:09
avatar
Hydrogen is the answer to all the worlds energy  needs .Not only is it one of the most abundant resources we have it also is completely clean when used in a fuel cell .Not only can it be used in vehicles it can also be used in power stations to generate clean energy  for our homes.Its cheap ,clean and hydrogen cars and buses are already being made so the technology is readily available.Just imagine how nice it would be for each country in the world to be energy independent,no more being held to ransom by the arabs ,our troops could come home ,we would save billions in taxes by not being involved in wars over oil, clean air to breathe and global warming would be virtually gone.There`s only one reason that we haven`t converted to hydrogen yet and that is because the few Greedy mega rich won`t allow it to happen, never mind the planet as long as they can have their yachts and private jets.
avatar

Brighton & Hove City council want to introduce 20mph speed limits on residential roads, to protect cyclists & other vulnerable road users, & to reduce emissions.   Clearly they don't understand that lower speed means driving in a lower gear, which increases fuel consumption & exhaust emissions.  

I'm all for protecting other road users, but the other road users must play their part too. Kamikaze cyclists & pedestrians that don't look where they are going have some responsibility for their own safety too!

28/04/2012 21:03
avatar
L T Fisherton, you seem to have forgotten the Japanese who in ww2 did the same if not even worse than the Germans so on that basis, I presume your house is empty of goods as virtually everything electrical has components made in Japan, including the computer you are using to access the internet to write your rubbish, which of course means you are also " urinating on the gravestones of those servicemen " who died. In addition, the vast majority of cars contain components made in Germany, like light bulbs, alternators, electronic fuel injection ( both petrol and diesel ) systems, ABS braking systems and so on, so I presume you don't drive a car. If so and you use public transport, you have a few more problems because buses all use German and Japanese components as do trains, taxi's etc. I also suggest you check the history books because all these companies or what was left of them were actually taken over by us the British after the war and turned around so the German's could manufacture vehicles and other things to make War reparations as we had totally destroyed their manufacturing capabilities, so the only person who is scum here is you for bringing up this stupid, idiotic rubbish.....
28/04/2012 12:03
avatar

What do we really expect - honesty? Look at almost any advert for say, shampoo and soap powder, do they do everything they say they will? Look at adverts for acne, and other skin care products and ask yourself why they show models with flawless skin and wonderfully shiny hair. We are duped all the time with advertising, and this includes loaded figures by manufacturers, and of course politicians fiddle the figures too did you know?

This world, and by that I really do mean this world, is largely an illusion we have all bought into, and what is the greatest medium for our brainwashing - TV and advertising.

My message is: stop believing and question everything however small, you will be suprised how much c**p you will rid yourself , or relieve yourself of.

avatar
I know it sounds dreadfully boring to all you young tearabouts but my main driving maixim is MPG comes before MPH. If you drive with your foot on the floor all the time, it is no good at all moaning and **** about the price of fuel. Keep to speed limits and drive gently. You'll be amazed at the reduction in fuel comsumption. OK I'm a boring old fart but try it and see.
13/05/2012 13:29
avatar
The factors that affect fuel consumption are constantly variable. When you accelerate you are using more fuel,so cruising is always more economical because you can maintain any given speed with much less throttle and it isn't so much the revs your engine is turning over at, it is the amount of throttle required to maintain that speed. However, when you are cruising at speeds above 60 mph, the vehicles aerodynamics come into play.  If you have a relatively slippery  car, it will go through the air much easier than a big 4 wheel drive like a Range Rover so the slower your cruising speed the better, etc. The vehicles gearing also comes into play. Diesel engined vehicles tend to be much higher geared than petrol engined ones because a diesels rev range is a lot lower than a petrol engine and they produce more torque at lower revs. But petrol engined cars can also benefit from higher gearing which is why BMW and Mercedes are now getting exceptional fuel consumption figures from their large petrol engined cars because they now have 7 speed transmissions ( 8 speed in the case of the Lexus ) so the engine is always spinning at lower revs. They are also turbo charging them which gives them a diesel like power delivery, i.e. high torque at low revs. Then there is vehicle weight. The more weight you carry ( and this does include if you have a full tank of fuel ) the more fuel you will require so carry 4 passengers and a load of stuff and you use more fuel. Tyre pressures also come into play. If they underinflated they cause more drag. But really it all comes down to how you drive. The less throttle you use the less fuel you use. Its that simple.
avatar
It's just false advertising in the selling of cars and if the transport ministry is involved they are just as guilty as the manufacturer. It surely is not that hard to determine the fuel consumption of any car, anywhere and in any conditions.
avatar
Lol...The instant it says 'Official Government Tests' or government research you know it's a complete and utter lieSmile
28/04/2012 11:21
avatar

what's new about the general public getting shafted once again.

28/04/2012 11:03
avatar

I drive a diesel citron Picasso 2.0 HDI, 02 reg and have found you can get near the "offical figures" but you have to drive with a feather foot and anticipate things such as braking, overtaking etc well in advance and coast down inclines. put the right foot down and all figures fly out of the window. I set the computor to give constant mpg readout to assist and it does focus the driving style some what.

Real world? you find yourself being swamped by other drivers!

 

Forgot to add that anything over about 65 mph the figures tumble. Still better than the brother in laws 23 mpg diesel range rover! (for his sake I hope my sis don't read this Smile)

28/04/2012 11:01
avatar

I have covered 8000 miles in my Ford focus 1.6TDCI Zetec 115 and my average fuel consumption over that time is 52MPG and that is not taking it easy im sure if I had driven carefully I could easily have managed at least 58MPG not quite 67.3 but not 42.3 either. So I would seriously question the figures in this article. Id question the manufacturerers figures also. But I would say from my experience it would probably be possible to do 67.3MPG if driven extremely carefully but to average 42.3MPG I would have to drive everywhere in first gear at 4500RPM.

Sensatuionalist rubbish as per usual

28/04/2012 12:03
avatar

It is a fact that if you buy more the price can come down.

If everyone buys cars that can do 70mpg then fuel will end up twice the price it was when cars did 35mpg. The manufacturers have to make so much money to keep production running and to provide a return on their borrowing to their investors.

It has happened with gas, electricity etc.

By the same token people on a fixed budget end up getting less for the same outlay.

ie. an old lady who paid £400 per year to heat her house finds that she can only have the heating on for half the length of time now because she still has only £400 per year to spend on heating.

In future she may only be able to have the heating on for a quarter of the time.

 

 

28/04/2012 10:46
avatar

 

Took delivery of a new VW Golf 1.6 TDi Bluemotion DSG yesterday.

 

Delivery mileage about 80 and the computer showed average consumption around 52 as per this article.

 

However I experimented with driving style this morning and by taking a lot of care maintained consumption in the high 60s and so far have got the average up to 62.

 

So. its really all down to driving style but admittedly the style rquired to get the consumption figures is not one that I could easily maintain long term. Fine for a rolling road but not so much for real life.

 

The problem is braking. Every time one hits the brake then forward motion and its associated energy is lost and can only be regained by using more fuel.

 

The manufacturer numbers are correct but the demands on the driver to achieve them are unrealistic.

28/04/2012 10:34
avatar
The fact that larger engines running with less effort perform relatively better (and in some cases are actually more frugal) doesn't surprise me. MSN are right to highlight this, many is a fool who has purchased an utterly gutless car because of its MPG figures only to find that merely keeping up a reasonable speed means foot hard down on the throttle pedal. Many of the manufacturers of course design their cars to do well in the official government tests, not least because of the CO2 figures and tax implications, but not necessarily for real world driving.
28/04/2012 14:49
avatar

Stephen, solar and wind have no business being connected to National Power Grids. They are unavoidably incapable of satisfying base load and peak load essential requirements, and are a colossal White Elephant and waste of Public resources.

 

They do have their place, which is for small scale off-grid application, and where they are fit for purpose, I am a huge enthusiast (to the extent that I am presently in the process of designing and building a radically new type of small wind generator and blade system - there is no generator made that is capable of mounting my blade design, so I am having to design a new type of generator to be able to have the blades functioning).

 

Pretending that these devices can fulfil a function that they are simply incapable of providing, is doing nobody any favours at all. 

28/04/2012 11:03
avatar

I thought it had been well known for many years that the published figures are as a comarison between cars, not an indication of what you'll achieve on the road.

Any test figures obtained will be useless to anyone unless they are all obtained under the exact same comditions, i.e on a rolling road under controlled conditions.

As soon as you get other factors involved such as traffic, hills, wind, rain etc they become usless for comparison between vehicles.

28/04/2012 16:39
avatar
Have you ever noticed that Toyota Prius's on the motorway are always travelling at about 90mph and having the petrol engine thrashed, doubt whether many of them actually achieve even the lower figure.
28/04/2012 10:45
avatar

Official Government statistics. No doubt miliband will blame the tories and call for an inquiry.

Every car is different and testing on a smooth traffic free, bump free track in ideal weather conditions will always give better results compared to a real road usage scenario.

 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Latest Cars videos

10 reasons to make MSN UK your homepage (© Microsoft)
Image Search for The one improvement... Mercedes-Benz S 350 L CDI Bluetec on Bing
Image
Previous 1 of 1 Next
loading
See more results results by

More on msn Cars